[jims4]

I wasn't aware the CRK's had been faked, anyone able to confirm my suspicions before i lodge a dispute on these.




If they are fakes, there the best made I've seen. Only fault I can find is with the placement of the vent holes.


Box is battered but well made, not sure about the label and placement.


Heel nipples should be ok on a pre 05?


Labels seem to be the give away.



Cheers for any help.

[Lurkzilla]

I have just checked mine, and they are the same as yours apart from the lable?







Hope this helps.

---

p.s. image shack has changed

[mr.pure]

Are you lot making up your own rules about fake spotting ?
There is nothing wrong with those CRKs.
Label placement was only an issue with the 35th release.
Heel clits pre 35th Anniversary were quite normal.

[jims4]

Cheers folks

I realized as soon as Lurking put those pics up that I'd got my serial No's and PIN No's mixed up.

[Squeaky]

Is it just the serialnumber that should differ on both shoes. Then why is it missing on the blue CRK's. They look nice by the way.

[Lurkzilla]

I think they introduced the serial numbers in 2003 and that’s why they have different labels.

Blue 11/02

Red 01/03

[cracky]

There is nothing wrong with those CRKs.

Apart from the fact they are CRK's!!!!

[Squeaky]

I quite like the CRK's but I remember somebody saying that they 'fall apart' after a while.

[Grimmy]

The individual serial numbers for each shoe were introduced in 2003. And yes, the CRK's tend to literally start cracking after a while which is why they do look ok brand new but will look like crap after getting some wear.