Fake CRK's? - Printable Version
+- SuperstarDB.com #SSDB (https://www.superstardb.com)
+-- Forum: General (https://www.superstardb.com/forum-14.html)
+--- Forum: Fake Spotting (https://www.superstardb.com/forum-10.html)
+--- Thread: Fake CRK's? (/thread-6449.html)
+- SuperstarDB.com #SSDB (https://www.superstardb.com)
+-- Forum: General (https://www.superstardb.com/forum-14.html)
+--- Forum: Fake Spotting (https://www.superstardb.com/forum-10.html)
+--- Thread: Fake CRK's? (/thread-6449.html)
Fake CRK's? - jims4 - 20-12-09
I wasn't aware the CRK's had been faked, anyone able to confirm my suspicions before i lodge a dispute on these.
![[Image: 014-6.jpg]](http://i106.photobucket.com/albums/m262/jims4/014-6.jpg)
![[Image: 006-11.jpg]](http://i106.photobucket.com/albums/m262/jims4/006-11.jpg)
If they are fakes, there the best made I've seen. Only fault I can find is with the placement of the vent holes.
![[Image: 001-11.jpg]](http://i106.photobucket.com/albums/m262/jims4/001-11.jpg)
Box is battered but well made, not sure about the label and placement.
![[Image: 004-5.jpg]](http://i106.photobucket.com/albums/m262/jims4/004-5.jpg)
Heel nipples should be ok on a pre 05?
![[Image: 005-6.jpg]](http://i106.photobucket.com/albums/m262/jims4/005-6.jpg)
Labels seem to be the give away.
![[Image: 002-11.jpg]](http://i106.photobucket.com/albums/m262/jims4/002-11.jpg)
![[Image: 003-8.jpg]](http://i106.photobucket.com/albums/m262/jims4/003-8.jpg)
Cheers for any help.
RE: Fake CRK's? - Lurkzilla - 20-12-09
I have just checked mine, and they are the same as yours apart from the lable?
![[Image: 13115728.jpg]](http://img704.imageshack.us/i/13115728.jpg/)
![[Image: w640.png]](http://g.imageshack.us/img704/13115728.jpg/1/)
![[Image: 52041527.jpg]](http://img706.imageshack.us/i/52041527.jpg/)
![[Image: w640.png]](http://g.imageshack.us/img706/52041527.jpg/1/)
![[Image: 65721725.jpg]](http://img710.imageshack.us/i/65721725.jpg/)
![[Image: w640.png]](http://g.imageshack.us/img710/65721725.jpg/1/)
Hope this helps.
p.s. image shack has changed
RE: Fake CRK's? - mr.pure - 20-12-09
Are you lot making up your own rules about fake spotting ?
There is nothing wrong with those CRKs.
Label placement was only an issue with the 35th release.
Heel clits pre 35th Anniversary were quite normal.
RE: Fake CRK's? - jims4 - 20-12-09
Cheers folks
I realized as soon as Lurking put those pics up that I'd got my serial No's and PIN No's mixed up.
RE: Fake CRK's? - Squeaky - 20-12-09
Is it just the serialnumber that should differ on both shoes. Then why is it missing on the blue CRK's. They look nice by the way.
RE: Fake CRK's? - Lurkzilla - 20-12-09
I think they introduced the serial numbers in 2003 and that’s why they have different labels.
Blue 11/02
Red 01/03
RE: Fake CRK's? - cracky - 20-12-09
(20-12-09, 04:04 PM)mr.pure Wrote: There is nothing wrong with those CRKs.
Apart from the fact they are CRK's!!!!
RE: Fake CRK's? - Squeaky - 20-12-09
I quite like the CRK's but I remember somebody saying that they 'fall apart' after a while.
RE: Fake CRK's? - Grimmy - 20-12-09
The individual serial numbers for each shoe were introduced in 2003. And yes, the CRK's tend to literally start cracking after a while which is why they do look ok brand new but will look like crap after getting some wear.