Posts: 149
Threads: 12
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
6
Ladies and Gents
Please give me your opinions on whether these 35ths are genuine or fake.
Item nimber is 190764948018
Im undecided. I asked for more pics to be put up including shots of the heel. The seller has added more pics but no heel pics to check for heel clits. Please advise.
Also if all you experts confirm they are ok please don't outbide me haha!
Thanks in advance
Luke
Posts: 5,199
Threads: 220
Joined: Nov 2006
Reputation:
300
i´d say real deal.
whack lacing is killing your shoes!
Posts: 15,777
Threads: 177
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation:
257
The Hip receipt is very convincing but the date seems to say the 1st of January 2005, which is wrong.
Only the City and Consortium series came out in January.
Also, the laces don't look right and the tag end isn't clearly the type it should be.
I'd ask for a picture of the label end of the box that he seems to have gone out of his way not to photograph.
Gut feeling would be no.
Posts: 6,696
Threads: 42
Joined: Aug 2007
Reputation:
214
Yeah, I'm with Pure on all his points. You definitely want to see the end of the box.
If God gives you lemons you should find a new God
Posts: 5,906
Threads: 57
Joined: Jan 2008
Reputation:
216
The receipt looks like it says 1st of either the 2nd or 3rd 2005.
Other than that, I am with Pure and Z on this, need to see the box end. If the seller isn't willing to do that, then steer well clear!
"SSDB does not condone or promote wack behaviour"
Posts: 4,764
Threads: 25
Joined: Oct 2007
Reputation:
361
+1 for Pure. Although the box looks real. Counterfeit boxes tend to be more flimsy.
Posts: 3,949
Threads: 54
Joined: Oct 2009
Reputation:
245
What about the serial numbers?
Robert147 is now Squeaky
