Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

canvas sample superstar
#16

I've always been on the Hemp mate.. use a couple of 25kg sack fulls a year, the Carp go barmy for it. Laughing

Ads
Reply
#17

manus Wrote:white canvas would just annoy me, they'd be filthy after one day of wear.

I thought the same! I'd never wear them although they look nice if you could keep them cleanRazz
Reply
#18

I love them!

but they WOULD get dirty if i wore them.. in about 5 seconds!

I need more lemon pledge...  Very Happy 
Reply
#19

i had a pair of all white canvas back in the mid 90s. loved em.
Reply
#20

nuffin special, simple plain. nice if ya like that.Smile

repunzal,repunzal let down ya hair so i can climb up and get into ya underwear.
Reply
#21

i thing the sample is FAKE... why at handtag with treebar and than at the shoes with treefoil.
Reply
#22

it was 100% real.. i had bunch of pairs made in 2000 with 'treebar' logo on tags, even stan smith's from '98 was in 'treebar' box..

cheers
Reply
#23

All samples comes with a tag like that..

Oh, and that logo is called Equipment.. Wink

"It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to open one's mouth and remove all doubt"

Abraham Lincoln
Reply
#24

They are decent, but I think I'd get a canvas superstar in black or something, otherwise your going to get some terrible staining from your jeans.
Reply
#25

I'd rock it!!
Reply
#26

Can we expect them in stores ss 08?
Reply
#27

I´m pretty sure that these are old.. 1997.. I have a pair like this from back then..

The inside tag looks old..

"It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to open one's mouth and remove all doubt"

Abraham Lincoln
Reply
#28

Yeah and they were re-released in 06/07 with patent puke_r stripes. A footlocker US thing I think.
Reply
#29

paytwo Wrote:I´m pretty sure that these are old.. 1997.. I have a pair like this from back then..

The inside tag looks old..

But the date on the tag is 07. The sample's birth, I guess..?
Reply
#30

elise Wrote:
paytwo Wrote:I´m pretty sure that these are old.. 1997.. I have a pair like this from back then..

The inside tag looks old..

But the date on the tag is 07. The sample's birth, I guess..?

Read again. Maybe it's 97! Sorry. Hehe
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)