23-11-06, 02:55 PM
Wikis are an excecise in anarchy (the political variety, rather than the media fed violent variety)...
For the most they tend to work for the same reason that open source software development works.
However, elements of vandalism can creep in on wikipedia this tends to be political stuff - people with opposing views will alter pages to their bend. Just check any pages on wikipedia about Arab-Israeli conflict.
Wikipedia generally has to moderate these pages.
However, our Superstars Wiki would attract much less attention. Personally I was thinking of a seperate Superstars Wiki, however, a cheaper and easier way of going about it would be to just add pages to Wikipedia, after all it has pages for computer games and such as the like - so why not trainers...
For the most they tend to work for the same reason that open source software development works.
However, elements of vandalism can creep in on wikipedia this tends to be political stuff - people with opposing views will alter pages to their bend. Just check any pages on wikipedia about Arab-Israeli conflict.
Wikipedia generally has to moderate these pages.
However, our Superstars Wiki would attract much less attention. Personally I was thinking of a seperate Superstars Wiki, however, a cheaper and easier way of going about it would be to just add pages to Wikipedia, after all it has pages for computer games and such as the like - so why not trainers...
"All food is pie!"