Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

99% sure these are fake...
#1

I bought these from a guy on the SF forum...very cheap...$50 AUD. I kinda thought these might have turned out to be fake...I received his assurance i could return them if they were fake.

Below are the pics. The label on the right of the box 'Bailetti Sports' appears legit, so i think these may have been purchased instore.

1. There are slight heel nipples
2. The number on the inside of the tongue tag is the same on both shoes (tag looks pretty dodgy itself)
3. The label looks wrong on the box

[Image: boxlabeluw8.jpg]
[Image: boxlabeluw8.207c4756f7.jpg]

[Image: superleften6.jpg]
[Image: superleften6.a916c86a8d.jpg]
[Image: tonguelabel1qn3.jpg]
[Image: tonguelabel1qn3.8bbeecfc39.jpg]

[Image: storelabelkn2.jpg]
[Image: storelabelkn2.784b6189b3.jpg]
Reply
#2

Im not a specialist just yet but I know that older SS's have tags like that, the numbers are the same because its the art number not a serial number. The box looks fine (albeit old) and im not positive but I think its not that unusual for older models to have nipples like that! Legit is my opinion, but if im wrong let me know!

From the south to yo mouth!!
Reply
#3

I knew about the older models possibly having nips. I think i read that on this fine forum.

Whats the difference between an art number and a serial number?

Thanks for your comments Dirty.
Reply
#4

No prob mate, its what we're here for! If you look at the tags on newer models they have an art number and a serial number. The art number is like the id number for the artwork or design of the shoe so these numbers should match on any pair you have, the bottom number is the serial number and these should be different as each (legit) shoe has its own unique number! Hope that helps!

From the south to yo mouth!!
Reply
#5

Dirty Wrote:The box looks fine (albeit old)...

it looks old because the shoes are from 2001 - on the label it says 11/01, that means they were made November 01. I'd say the shoes are fine, the older soops do have the nips, and the label under the tongue looks fine for an older model. Also the fact that these appear to have bought instore help the case. I say nice pick-up thumbright

the boy with the three stripes
Reply
#6

Well, i'll be damned... i was so sure these were duds, as the title of this thread suggests.

I have just messaged the seller to ask him when he bought them, but could they have been sitting there for that long? I'd be shocked, if he told me they were a recent bargain purchase.

I should also ad there were no tags.
Reply
#7

Look fine to me..

" shocking cock-up, the mice were furious "
Reply
#8

Look good to me as well. They're older models so should have a nipple, art number should be the same, look like they've been bought from a genuine shop - all good thumbright
Reply
#9

RRP $140.. haha, made me laugh Laughing

cheers
Reply
#10

Don't laugh sin, that's how much we pay for soops in Oz. Sad
Usually it's $120 for really basic pairs, regular pairs are about $150 and vintages are about $180. Shocked
That's why I don't buy from here. Laughing

"Babyface, 6'2" with an L.A brim, I got shelltoes on I don't wear them Timbs"
Reply


Forum Jump: