Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

HELP NEEDED!!!
#1

I'm trying to get some info on a pair of adidas i bought off the bay just as the 35th Anniversary series dropped - they are like stan smiths & have a "Robert Haillet" signature on them in gold.

I know originally the stan smiths were branded robert haillet (a french tennis player) & then adidas changed it to stan smith as he won the open or something, but thats about all i know...

I have seen similar pairs on Rakuten (in white) but these are black butter leather & google hasn't thrown anything up - can anyone help???

The label inside has the following markings:

SIZE 7 1/2
(26.0)
01/Q1/09
FACT. L-24
ART.759810
MADE IN JAPAN

The sellers ebay listing said that these were a japan only release & were rarer than any 35th anniversary - i reckon he's right - well certainly from what i've been able 2 find out anyway! Laughing

Anyway below are a couple of pics - any info greatly appreciated! Very Happy

[Image: haillet12kr.jpg]

[Image: hailletsignature2lp.jpg]

Some people think i'm obsessed... but i just think i'm well dressed!

Shell toes rule!

[Image: banner.gif]
Reply
#2

WOOOOOOOOWWW

they are really nice!

I have some very similar but they are stan smith supremes..

what info did you need?

I need more lemon pledge...  Very Happy 
Reply
#3

olstar Wrote:what info did you need?

Anything! Laughing

I can't find any info on 'em anywhere - i know they are very similar to stan smiths but these have a low back like vintage superstars & the white trim on the heel is suede not leather...

There are no markings on the tongue & there are no trefoils or adidas markings on the outside of the shoe except the side of the sole, in the center of the sole (as on stan smiths, in the middle of the tread) & also the insoles say adidas.

I'd just like some links to info about them, whether they were limited or a rare colourway etc

I'd also like to know what date they were made?

The label has 01/Q1/09 on it but obviously this can't but configured into a date - unless someone knows different...

Confused

Some people think i'm obsessed... but i just think i'm well dressed!

Shell toes rule!

[Image: banner.gif]
Reply
#4

I think it'll mean they were made in 2001, in the first quarter, nineth batch.
Reply
#5

bobby dassler Wrote:The label has 01/Q1/09 on it but obviously this can't but configured into a date - unless someone knows different...

Confused

Effel Wrote:I think it'll mean they were made in 2001, in the first quarter, nineth batch.

Well done that man! Cool

That's a good enough answer 4 me! Very Happy

At least thats some of the mystery solved...

Wink

Some people think i'm obsessed... but i just think i'm well dressed!

Shell toes rule!

[Image: banner.gif]
Reply
#6

Nice one effel dude!

That makes sence!

We could do with an adidas superstar obsessed adidas employee onboard for puzzles like this!

I need more lemon pledge...  Very Happy 
Reply
#7

Well i just based it on the nike and adidas system which usually is month and year.
Reply
#8

I kept thinking it must be date related but couldn't figure out how because i didn't understand what the Q was all about & thought the 09 obviously couldn't mean 1909 or 2009...

It seems logical now you've pointed it out! Embarassed

So thanks to Effel, i now know they were made early 2001 - anyone else ever seen them before or know of any links regarding them?

Some people think i'm obsessed... but i just think i'm well dressed!

Shell toes rule!

[Image: banner.gif]
Reply
#9

Shocked 6 months have passed & still no more info - guess they must be pretty rare then! Very Happy
sly bump hehehe

Wink

Some people think i'm obsessed... but i just think i'm well dressed!

Shell toes rule!

[Image: banner.gif]
Reply
#10

The TBD's in that photograph are fake.
Just noticed.
Carry on !
Laughing


Reply
#11

Huh? Shocked Confused Please explain mr. p?

Some people think i'm obsessed... but i just think i'm well dressed!

Shell toes rule!

[Image: banner.gif]
Reply
#12

The brown shoes on the left are a copy of the To Be Determined's that were set aside as a Consortium release but never used.
All the Consortiums had a vintage cream sole and that is clearly beigey brown.
Cool


Reply
#13

LMFAO!!! Laughing

You're the only person 2 spot that (other than woody when he 1st asked if they were fake & i spouted some bollox about buying off ebay & that they were genuine - the other pic somewhere on here clearly shows the insole printing as being black & white instead of coloured & printed upsidedown!

Ohh yeah - & the fact they are a superstar 1 shape & not vintage is also a big clue - look at the heel in the other pic! Laughing

Well done Mr. P "oirot" Laughing

Some people think i'm obsessed... but i just think i'm well dressed!

Shell toes rule!

[Image: banner.gif]
Reply
#14

Sorry 4 bullshitting aswell - i woz a n00b back then & a wannabe - now i'm just a wannabe Embarassed

Some people think i'm obsessed... but i just think i'm well dressed!

Shell toes rule!

[Image: banner.gif]
Reply
#15

I didn't even realise that was your photo.
Didn't read the thread probably when it first came up.
Never came in this part of town until quite recently.
Are the Bapes real ?


Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)