Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Atmos comparison 1s vs 2
#1

For those who asked for this..
I'm not really the best person to ask really as my camera is old and shit..

1.The main difference is the sole colour from white to chalk but that isn't much difference really tbh

2.The pattern and material varies slightly from the 1st release..The 1st ones actually glow better and easier..the 2nd release it takes more dark for them to actually begin to glow.

Thats pretty much it that i can spot but its a rush job havn't really looked in detail...

[Image: atmoscomparison003.jpg]
[Image: atmoscomparison002.jpg]
[Image: atmoscomparison001.jpg]
[Image: atmoscomparison005.jpg]

It's not the size of the feet!!it's the amount of quality on em
Reply
#2

I prefer the 1st pair wouldnt bother with this latest pair if i had them. If anyone sees either pair in a uk11 give me a heads up.
Cheers for the pics poke.
Reply
#3

Nice work Pokey, I don't feel too bad about missing out, they are way to similar to warrant both pairs, I have a spare deadstock pair in a UK9.5 if anyone is interested came with the DJ Hasebe CD.(super rare Wink )

With God's help I'll conquer this terrible affliction.
Reply
#4

Fucking hell.. what a bunch of lazy cunts they are at Atmos! Rolling Eyes

" shocking cock-up, the mice were furious "
Reply
#5

Wasn't the other thing that the first pair scales glowed and second the outline glowed? (could be the other way round, or could be completely wrong)

'I paid for the suede!'
Reply
#6

Thanks pokey! If anyone sees either pair in a uk8 or UK 7.5 give me a heads up.
Reply
#7

How do they fit Dave? Slightly big or true to size?
Reply
#8

(17-04-11, 03:53 PM)pokey27 Wrote:  1.The main difference is the sole colour from white to chalk but that isn't much difference really tbh

But the 1st release had chalk shells and soles – do the 2nd release just have 'darker chalk' shells and soles? (like the colour on the 35th anniversary vins?)

Other than that (and it's hardly visible in the pics) and the reversed pattern these look pretty much identical.

Thanks for posting, it saved me some money thumbleft

Superstars are indeed super...
Reply
#9

(17-04-11, 06:35 PM)Tony L4 Wrote:  How do they fit Dave? Slightly big or true to size?

I find 80's slightly bigger so when possible I go half a size down.

80's UK9.5 compared to a SS1 UK10
[Image: sdc10651e.jpg]


Pokey's compared to a normal size Laughing
[Image: sdc10657p.jpg]


With God's help I'll conquer this terrible affliction.
Reply
#10

LaughingLaughing

repunzal,repunzal let down ya hair so i can climb up and get into ya underwear.
Reply
#11

(17-04-11, 04:41 PM)Lurkzilla Wrote:  Nice work Pokey, I don't feel too bad about missing out, they are way to similar to warrant both pairs, I have a spare deadstock pair in a UK9.5 if anyone is interested came with the DJ Hasebe CD.(super rare Wink )

Ooohh Wink

And LoL at Pokeys trainer!

[Image: yN6k7.jpg]
Reply
#12

City is correct that is also a difference to the 1st edition
dj - yes a darker chalk shell and toe...but deffo not as dark as a 35th vin.

Lurky - GIVE ME BACK MY FOOKING DMC TWATTY FUCKTARD :LOL:

It's not the size of the feet!!it's the amount of quality on em
Reply
#13

Whahahahaha, that's a great one Dave!!!!
Reply
#14

The outline glowed on the first ones and the whole scale glows on the new ones.
Still weak though.


Reply
#15

Ahhhh...I think Atmos was done soon after the 1st release....talk about overdone....
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: