sneakerpedia -
bewl - 09-12-11
stumbled upon this site a while back now, looking for rare superstars -
http://www.sneakerpedia.com thinks its a damn good idea -a sneaker wiki basically.
Problem is the fooker's swamped with nike and we're criminally under-represented! see thats the thing thats got me hooked to the stars -the variety of the buggers -there's literally a supe for everyone ain't tha!
So.....i was just wondering if any of yer's fancied showin the world whats out there
come on peeps, we got some serious heavy hitters comin ere! benji!- get them fookin damn fine customs on! Nik! you've got runnin shoes galore! Pure! 101+!! Tee! rare bleedin adidas! yer's get the idea...
Anyhoo, i'm not saying Go re-photo all ya pride and joys right now or nowt i'm jus sayin lets get them supes up, yer knar, spread the love
RE: sneakerpedia -
flyingcod - 09-12-11
Someone deserves to have their hampton lopped off for this sacrilegious blasphemy!
fc how very dare they
RE: sneakerpedia -
GeeBee - 10-12-11
sickening . . .
RE: sneakerpedia -
bewl - 10-12-11
I KNOW!!!!.....he's smudged the tick!
RE: sneakerpedia -
Inphinity - 10-12-11
Should be tried for crime against humanity
RE: sneakerpedia -
benji - 10-12-11
RE: sneakerpedia -
lorre - 10-12-11
Bewl i think there was another thread relating to Sneakerpedia awhile back. The basic idea behind the site is cool but the execution leaves alot to be desired and the 'gate keepers' have one hell of a job.
We at
eatmoreshoes would be more than happy to show members collections so drop us a line if interested.
We are already showcasing Benji's customs:
Benji
and Micheal's fast growing collection:
Michael
So why not show your kicks in a more adi friendly environment ?
cheers
RE: sneakerpedia -
Sneakerphile - 10-12-11
That site looks pointless and wank!
I think we'll all stick to showing our shit here, @ shellpros and @ eatmoreshoes.
And if adicolors with badly hacked off stripes and poorly painted n@#e ticks on them is the sort of thing they showcase, I don't think we wanna be associated with them.
RE: sneakerpedia -
lorre - 10-12-11
@ Sneakerphile you're totally right about the Sneakerpedia site god knows why Foot Locker are throwing money at it
And as a few of you may already know adidas are rumored to be launching their own archive site in 2012.
RE: sneakerpedia -
GeeBee - 10-12-11
That swoosh hatchet job is more than enough to precipitate a boycott . . . the association with footlocker too . . . even though a nice fella in footlocker gave me some free laces the other day when I popped in . . . not one decent shoe in the shop as usual.
RE: sneakerpedia -
Sneakerpimp - 10-12-11
Someone needs a square kick in the cock for that abomination.
RE: sneakerpedia -
lorre - 10-12-11
@ Sneakerpimp totally agree the thing is i not sure if you can upload directly to the site. So my point is who the hell is policing it a letting that nonsense in.
RE: sneakerpedia -
benji - 10-12-11
Was looking at the sf museum earlier that looked better, could do with some better looking adidas in the top ten tho.. ems is a good bet because all of us can help shape it with our contributions. Whose baby is shellpros, never figured it out, is it yours dean? Always good for searching colourways and materials.
RE: sneakerpedia -
pokey27 - 10-12-11
Shellpro's is Toms aka Teaj
RE: sneakerpedia -
bewl - 10-12-11
wooops well first off, i'll admit i made a schoolboy error by not searching for a sneakerpedia topic, or any mentions of it, my bad.
see thing i liked about it was the quite un-policed wiki aspect of it, okay that means that terrible custom gets it place in there with the rest of em but hey, thats the beauty of a wiki.
lorre i love eatmoreshoes! top notch work you doing there bud, but i see it as a totally different kettle of fish, more in depth and obviously absolutely adidas, both can co-exist as they are providing different services. i like poppin over to shellpros too - the thing i could never figure out as how to become a pro so to speak.
footlocker have got involved so they can get the lowdown on what sneakerheads are loading up and what they are loving, so we are doing superstars a disfavour if don't represent them in all their glory