The Adidas Superstar DB | #SSDB
These DMC's - Printable Version

+- The Adidas Superstar DB | #SSDB (https://www.superstardb.com)
+-- Forum: Adidas (https://www.superstardb.com/forum-15.html)
+--- Forum: Fake Adidas Spotting (https://www.superstardb.com/forum-10.html)
+--- Thread: These DMC's (/thread-5807.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5


These DMC's - Cluskey - 24-03-09

More pics of these, as i'm still unsure.

btw- there is an L for the label and the box seems pretty rigid.
If any other pics or anything would help please let me know!

Doesn't seem to be any sign of heel clits;
[Image: 24032009078.th.jpg]

[Image: 24032009079.th.jpg]

[Image: 24032009080.th.jpg]


[Image: 24032009082.th.jpg]

[Image: 24032009084.th.jpg]

[Image: 24032009074r.th.jpg]
[Image: 24032009075m.th.jpg]
[Image: 24032009076w.th.jpg]


RE: These DMC's - streak - 24-03-09

Well I for one still think those laces are wrong.. They ain't the ones shown in the original listing. Confused


RE: These DMC's - cracky - 24-03-09

I'm with Streak!


RE: These DMC's - Teaj - 24-03-09

They look legit to me Smile


RE: These DMC's - spitey - 24-03-09

that second to bottom picture of the back bothers me. maybe its just the angle. Confused


RE: These DMC's - Cluskey - 24-03-09

one is closer to the camera [right] than the other, and is at a slight angle


RE: These DMC's - GeeBee - 24-03-09

The photos on the listing for these were actually the photos from the previous run dmc auction from a different seller which I won but have still not received because of seller arsing about over payment. I think the seller of these just nicked the photos.
God only knows if any of them are legit...


RE: These DMC's - Cluskey - 24-03-09

Just disappointing more than anything really.
Everything seems ok, except the laces to me, which, if they have been out the wrapper, it does look like it.
May be ok.
Don't know what to do now really.
DAMN FAKES


RE: These DMC's - streak - 24-03-09

when he say's "taken out of the wrapper" does he mean taken out of the packet or unravelled and then rewound and put back in the packet?


RE: These DMC's - Cluskey - 24-03-09

I think so, i have sent another e-mail to him.
The packet did look as if it had been opened a good couple of times.