RE: Today I'll Mostly Be Wearing Superstars (part 6) -
Lorrie - 05-07-12
Wow. I wish I could unread your post.
Also, can you please never post pics of those trousers again?
Finally, even a blind dog finds a bone now and again.
RE: Today I'll Mostly Be Wearing Superstars (part 6) -
ez-1 - 05-07-12
Nice! It's good to have sex every now and then. But then again you should remember that sex is always best in the groups less than two
RE: Today I'll Mostly Be Wearing Superstars (part 6) -
streak - 05-07-12
Less than 2?
RE: Today I'll Mostly Be Wearing Superstars (part 6) -
Vortec - 05-07-12
Nice!!!
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WlpBO3L6UJo[/youtube]
RE: Today I'll Mostly Be Wearing Superstars (part 6) -
Inphinity - 05-07-12
SOMEONE WHO GOT THE NEW BLUE JOBBIES PUT THEM ON AND TAKE A PICTURE!
....... i know it's on everyone else's mind too.
RE: Today I'll Mostly Be Wearing Superstars (part 6) -
benji - 05-07-12
Choose your socks carefully
RE: Today I'll Mostly Be Wearing Superstars (part 6) -
ez-1 - 05-07-12
(05-07-12, 03:13 PM)streak Wrote: Less than 2?
groups less than two... I think it is also the most common
RE: Today I'll Mostly Be Wearing Superstars (part 6) -
streak - 05-07-12
groups less that two is one.. not a group..
maybe I need to read the conversation..
RE: Today I'll Mostly Be Wearing Superstars (part 6) -
ez-1 - 05-07-12
I was trying to be funny... Maybe it works better in Finnish...
But yeah if I really have to explain it ... less than two is not a group it's single, solo, what ever you call it
RE: Today I'll Mostly Be Wearing Superstars (part 6) -
pokey27 - 05-07-12
Basically he's calling Niko a wanker streak..Nothing new